Comments Off on EU Mocks Intel

EU Mocks Intel

Google phone is the talk of the town. Nook e-reader has potential as a tablet PC. iMAC 27-inch display having issues. Is a text message private. The courts to decide. Facebook privacy settings are screwed up.  New URL shrinkers appear. Al Gore predicts end of polar ice. Apple redesigned the App store. iPhone design may be poor. Super thin hard disk coming. MSFT may have stolen code. We’ll see. New Nintendo games. EU mocks Intel and the USA.

Brought to you by eHarmony. Go out this week! Check it out at www.eharmony.com using the code EHTECH for a free month…

Click to listen: [audio:http://m.podshow.com/media/12115/episodes/203171/tech5-203171-12-14-2009.mp3]



Comments to this post

Tags: ,
Comments Off on Everyone Making Handsets

Everyone Making Handsets

Game sales down down down. Dinos all came from South America. FCC baffled by complaints. Tri-band Wi-Fi coming soon. HP gets more PR. Cracking the cloud. Acer gets on Android bandwagon.

Brought to you by SquareSpace. Do a site this week! Check it out at www.squarespace.com using the code TECH for a big discount.

Click to listen: [audio:http://m.podshow.com/media/12115/episodes/202408/tech5-202408-12-10-2009.mp3]



Comments to this post

Tags: ,
Comments Off on Pondering Programming Language Requirements For Software QA Testing

Pondering Programming Language Requirements For Software QA Testing

As someone who has been in software QA (that’s software testing/bug finding) for over 13 years I’ve often read job listings where the requirement listed knowledge of a particular programming language. As such whenever I talk with someone (recruiter, HR person, etc.) about such jobs I always ask why there is such a requirement. There are times when such a requirement is valid (such as when an automated testing tool uses the language in question). Other times it is questionable.

The answer I hear most when asking about a programming language requirement is that the application under test is written in that language. I’m always a bit incredulous at this answer. Yes, it can be helpful to know the language an application is programmed in once a bug is found. Knowing the language can help the tester decipher error messages and point the programmer in the right direction in oprder to expedite a fix. But as a QA person how does knowledge of the language help me test the application? Not very much if I’m doing the job right.

Regardless of the programming language a good testers approach is to create test scenarios that test every requirement for the application. Their tests will be both constructive (following how requirements say the app should work) and destructive (trying to do things in ways the requirements don’t state). They will put every requirement through it’s paces down to confirming the number of characters allowed in a text field and that cancel buttons dismiss a dialog box with no further action.

My point is that regardless of the language an application is written in a good tester will be able to find the bugs and report under which circumstances they occur. Knowing the programming language of the application may help once the bug is found but is (usually) irrelevant to the actual act of finding them. And shouldn’t that be the focus of a QA job?

What do you think? Let me know in the comments below.



Comments to this post

Tags: , ,
Comments Off on AT&T Calls them HOGS!

AT&T Calls them HOGS!

Smartphone usage ruining the net. Apple Tablet coming in March. Net usage is 3.6 zetabytes per year. Twitter dev conference  announced. Bats ruining it for the rest of us. sun Oracle still being debated., Nokia to close stores.

Brought to you by eHarmony. Go out this week! Check it out at www.eharmony.com using the code EHTECH for a free month…

Click to listen: [audio:http://m.podshow.com/media/12115/episodes/202158/tech5-202158-12-09-2009.mp3]



Comments to this post

Tags: ,
Comments Off on Russia Lurks

Russia Lurks

Google Goggles is some odd real-time search. Russian to exploit cap and trade. Virgin Galactic will roll out rocket shortly. JooJoo tablet hits the scene. Apple does buy or will buy LaLa. Ixys buys Zilog. MSFT drops family pack. Why? iPOD touch session usage higher than with iPhone. Eric Schmidt lax on net privacy. Web attacks could be a thing of the past. Or not.

Brought to you by eHarmony. Go out this week! Check it out at www.eharmony.com using the code EHTECH for a free month…

Click to listen: [audio:http://m.podshow.com/media/12115/episodes/201851/tech5-201851-12-07-2009.mp3]



Comments to this post

Tags: ,